<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Llm on Dejan Bosanac</title>
    <link>https://sensatic.com/tags/llm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Llm on Dejan Bosanac</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sensatic.com/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>When Gemini Blocks Your Security Prompts</title>
      <link>https://sensatic.com/posts/2026-08-24-gemini-safety-filters-security-code-review/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://sensatic.com/posts/2026-08-24-gemini-safety-filters-security-code-review/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I recently tested new &lt;a href=&#34;https://deepmind.google/models/model-cards/gemini-3-7-flash/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;Gemini 3.7 Flash&lt;/a&gt; model against some code review prompts and it was the first time I&amp;rsquo;d seen these tasks blocked by Gemini safety filters.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reviewing agent sends code diffs along with a security review prompt that asks the model to identify vulnerabilities like SQL injection, command injection, path traversal, SSRF, and insecure deserialization. The diffs used in evals contain, of course, real vulnerability patterns, as that&amp;rsquo;s the whole point of evaluating how this agent performs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
